SDLC ExpertsFrom idea to pull request. Your developers just approve.
We give your team a coding agent with everything it needs to go from request to ready-to-merge PR, on your existing codebase. People stay in charge of the decisions; the agent does the rest. Two weeks, fixed scope.
Installing the tool takes an hour. The workflow around it is where teams stall.
Uneven usage
A few engineers fly, most barely touch it, and everyone has a different personal setup.
Explaining the same thing again
Every new chat starts from zero. Conventions and past decisions get re-explained, or ignored.
No proof it works
Leadership pays for licenses but can't point to faster delivery or fewer bugs.
Three pieces that turn AI tools into a working AI SDLC.
The almighty coding agent
An agent wired into your repo, tickets, tests and CI, with everything it needs to go from an approved idea to a pull request with a live preview environment. Your developer arrives when it's ready, reviews, and approves.
Self-learning decision wiki
Every decision your team makes is logged once, approved by a person, and followed by every agent from then on.
Decide once. Never explain it again.
Issues intake where you already talk
Anyone can raise a bug or feature request from Slack or email. It becomes a structured spec, and your tech team approves it before any code is written.
From a Slack message to a merged PR, with people deciding where it counts.
Your product tool (Jira, Linear, Monday, GitHub Issues and others) is integrated into every step and updates itself. Nobody moves tickets by hand.
- AnyoneRequestA bug or idea arrives by Slack or email.Ticket created
- AgentSpecIt becomes a spec and plan an agent can execute.Spec attached to ticket
- Tech teamApproveAn engineer signs off before any code is written.Status: Approved
- AgentBuildThe coding agent implements and tests on its own branch.In progress, branch linked
- Agent + CIPR, preview & AI reviewOpens a PR with a live preview environment; automated checks catch agent mistakes first.PR, preview and check results linked
- DeveloperApprove & mergeA focused review of what needs judgment.Status: Done
Every approval feeds the decision wiki, so the next spec starts from everything your team has already decided.
Fixed scope, fixed price. Start with a demo.
Live demo
- Watch the agent take a real request from idea to a PR with a live preview
- See the approval gates and decision wiki in action
- Talk through how it would fit your codebase
- Leave with a clear recommendation of where to start
Core Sprint
- Coding agent from approved idea to PR
- Product tool integrated and updated at every step
- Spec, plan and approval gates
- Preview environment and AI review on every PR
- One decision wiki shared across all your repos
- Two training sessions for a pilot squad
Retainer
- 2 days a month of hands-on work
- Decision wiki curation and cleanup
- New skills and agents as needs change
- Onboarding new engineers to the flow
Slack or email requests become specs your team approves.
Architecture, tooling and AI strategy advice, in prepaid 5-hour blocks.
Founder-led. Senior people only.
Noam Gherson
Founder & Head Engineer
Leads every project personally. Brings hands-on experience building AI-native development workflows on production code: coding agents, spec-driven planning, human approval gates and automated AI review in CI/CD. Background in full-stack and frontend architecture (Angular, RxJS) and AWS.
LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)www.noamyg.com (opens in a new tab)
Dana Ben Reytan Cymerman
Brand Advisor
Thirteen years in marketing communications and branding, including seven as Marcom Manager at Cidev Group, an electronics and embedded-solutions company. Earlier roles at SOS Children's Villages, Mitrelli, Publicis and OPEN.
LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)How we staff projects
- lead engineerthe founder, on every engagement
- specialistscloud · security · data, when a project needs them
- juniors0 (no juniors learning on your codebase)
Common questions
We already use Claude Code. Why do we need this?
Having the tool isn't the same as having the workflow. The demo shows the specs, gates and review that turn usage into faster merges instead of more PRs to review.
Security won't let agents near our code.
Permissions and gates are part of the setup: what agents may touch, where a person signs off, what runs only in CI.
Does the decision wiki change things on its own?
No. Agents propose entries; a person approves each one before any agent follows it.
Book a 30-minute demo. You'll see the whole flow and leave with a clear idea of where to start.
hello@sdlc-experts.com. Prices in NIS, before VAT.